Fortune? thread at Board67 - Mental about Celtic

View Poll Results: For 3.8 mill are you disapointed such an expensive signing did not start the game las

Voters
26. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    15 57.69%
  • No

    11 42.31%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32

Thread: Fortune?

  1. #1
    B.A.B. ZERO TOLERANCE Ellboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,228

    Default Fortune?

    Your Ad Here
    Not a bashing thread.

    Just a question?

    For 3.8 mill are you disapointed such an expensive signing did not start the game last night?

    I would have expected a player to be bought to play in exactly the sort of game we played last night. I think in the SPL Fortune will be an asset but for 3.8 mill would have expected an ever present at SPL and CPL level.
    Last edited by Ellboy; 19-08-2009 at 11:13 AM.


    LIVESTRONG

  2. #2
    Celtic Legend Martin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,628

    Default Re: Fortune?

    Yes. £3.8m is a lot of money for us and it makes him a 'big' signing. You would hope that our 'big' signings play in the big games. I have real doubts about this guy.

  3. #3
    Just Can't Get Enough Sex Panther's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    10,053

    Default Re: Fortune?

    I’m not sure if I'm disappointed that he didn’t play last night, as I don’t really rate the guy…

    But in principle I hear what you’re saying… 3.8 million for a striker who can only make the bench for our most important game of the season. To me that does seem a little worrying.

    From what I have seen from Fortune so far, I have been far from impressed, and I’m not even convinced he will be a hit in the SPL. It’s still quite early to be passing judgements on his ability, but so far, not good.

    What worries me most is that Mogga has said, he will be our last bit of business, in terms of strengthening the forward line. But, we clearly need another striker who can score goals!
    “If he wants to learn about scoring goals, he should nip over to watch us train at Lennoxtown some afternoon and I'll show him a thing or two about finishing”


  4. #4
    B.A.B. ZERO TOLERANCE Ellboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,228

    Default Re: Fortune?

    Quote Originally Posted by Martin View Post
    Yes. £3.8m is a lot of money for us and it makes him a 'big' signing. You would hope that our 'big' signings play in the big games. I have real doubts about this guy.
    Me also Martin, to me he looks to be going through the motions. No real desire to his play.

    He has shown some neat flashes especially when turning defenders, but lacks skill, touch, heart and an all important dig.

    Quote Originally Posted by rk1888 View Post
    I’m not sure if I'm disappointed that he didn’t play last night, as I don’t really rate the guy…!
    When the team was read out got to admit was not to disapointed either. Quite telling that our marquee signing was sitting on the bench and many of us felt it was the right decision.

    Quote Originally Posted by rk1888 View Post
    But in principle I hear what you’re saying… 3.8 million for a striker who can only make the bench for our most important game of the season. To me that does seem a little worrying.]!
    Worrying indeed.

    Keep telling myself that TM must know that Fortune is a player. As it is not like he has only known him for 5 minutes, surely half a season at WBA was more than enough to asses his ability.

    Quote Originally Posted by rk1888 View Post
    From what I have seen from Fortune so far, I have been far from impressed, and I’m not even convinced he will be a hit in the SPL. It’s still quite early to be passing judgements on his ability, but so far, not good.

    What worries me most is that Mogga has said, he will be our last bit of business, in terms of strengthening the forward line. But, we clearly need another striker who can score goals!
    He must hit it off at SPL level, cant be that bad surely?

    Never knew Mogga said he would be the only forward joining, that's disapointing.

    I really like Mowbray but I hope I'm proved entirely wrong, I can see Fortune contributing to his downfall.

    Cmon Fortune prove us wrong.
    Last edited by Ellboy; 19-08-2009 at 11:55 AM.


    LIVESTRONG

  5. #5
    like fuck Bhoys Dont Cry's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    8,491

    Default Re: Fortune?

    Yes, I am. What the fuck was he thinking starting donkey. Every time the ball went up there, he was either looking the other way or out of sight. Fortune would have done a lot better in this role from the start imo.



  6. #6
    Green2thecore
    Guest Green2thecore's Avatar

    Default Re: Fortune?

    Yes I am dissapointed and completely perplexed at why he did not start.

    He would have been the only choice for me to lead the line. Skippy is too small and Samantha is absolutely shite.

    I have seen enough to convince me that he will do well for Celtic. He is strong, holds the ball up well and has all the technique required. I think crucially, he is short on confidence and this is why we have not seen the best of him yet.

    Facing teams like Accies and St Johnstone will suit him down to the ground and provide him the opportunity to get his confidence up.

  7. #7
    Show us your Shareen SwoopingVulture's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Burgh
    Posts
    1,469

    Default Re: Fortune?

    As Green2thecore says, if you're going to have one up front it should have been him. Strong and fast he could have brought McGeady, Maloney and Brown into the game. I don't understand why Samaras was picked, a player who genuinely looks like he'll fall over at any second.

    He has only had 3 competitive games but i'm beginning to get concerned. He needs to score soon, if he doesn't in the next couple of games i can see his confidence going and then we are back to having one striker at the club that can score goals.

  8. #8
    Celtic Legend metrobhoy2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    14,233

    Default Re: Fortune?

    I wasn't disappointed and I think this is maybe a decision that the manager got correct last night. These two look pretty poor when they came on to replace Samaras who had little to work with being up top himself.

    There was one moment where you could criticize Samaras for his movement when Fox delivered a great ball across goal. I'm not sure if McDonald of Fortune would have scored this type of goal either though.

  9. #9
    Green2thecore
    Guest Green2thecore's Avatar

    Default Re: Fortune?

    I cannot believe anyone would still defend Samantha.

    He is criminal and should never got near the hoops again after last season's shite. I cannot stand him, he is rotten. And as a man, he just seems like a complete tit.

  10. #10
    B.A.B. ZERO TOLERANCE Ellboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,228

    Default Re: Fortune?

    Quote Originally Posted by Green2thecore View Post
    I cannot believe anyone would still defend Samantha.

    He is criminal and should never got near the hoops again after last season's shite. I cannot stand him, he is rotten. And as a man, he just seems like a complete tit.
    Just like Caldwell he's good enough for the SPL but only just.


    LIVESTRONG

  11. #11
    Fantastic Expectations... Squire's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Cumbernauld
    Posts
    5,117

    Default Re: Fortune?

    Yes definitely disappointed. If your going one up front it's obvious Fortunes the man to do it considering he's been brought here mainly to hold the ball up and bring other into play, something he could have done last night.

    I can't be to harsh on Mowbray though because before the game i obviously thought 'why Samaras?', but at the same time i trust the guy (Mowbray) and was saying he's obviously got something up his sleeve so let's see what happens. To criticize him now would be a bit hypocritical.

    'IF YOU GET TIRED, OF JUST HANGIN AROUND
    PICK UP A GUITAR, AND SPIN A WEB OF SOUND'

  12. #12
    Banned CE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Glasgow!
    Posts
    4,532

    Default Re: Fortune?

    No, the striker who is upfront on his own has to be able to take the one chance or so they might get. He looks scared to shot. Clumbsy. Plays out on the wing. Gets in the way.

  13. #13
    Celtic Legend metrobhoy2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    14,233

    Default Re: Fortune?

    It was an impossible task. Playing up front alone against a team who give you zero time on the ball. I've always said that Samaras isn't good enough for the CL but who is to play solo front role? Nobody we have anyway.

    We don't even have the players to play behind a lone striker who can spot a quick pass.

  14. #14
    Show us your Shareen SwoopingVulture's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Burgh
    Posts
    1,469

    Default Re: Fortune?

    He is criminal and should never got near the hoops again after last season's shite. I cannot stand him, he is rotten. And as a man, he just seems like a complete tit.
    Care to back up that statement?

  15. #15
    Green2thecore
    Guest Green2thecore's Avatar

    Default Re: Fortune?

    Quote Originally Posted by SwoopingVulture View Post
    Care to back up that statement?
    Oh yes, most definetly.

    His comments towards the huns last season, were idiotic. BRAINLESS.

    He can be found shirking out of tackles, like I have never witnessed before in any other player. COWARD.

    At Hampden last year after the CIS cup victory and after he had came on as a sub and missed several sitters, he paraded around with the cup - saluting the fans as if he was the main man. EGO MANIAC.

    He swaggers around with that effeminite hair cut, which must hinder him when heading a football. SHALLOW.

  16. #16
    ALL HAIL LENNY !!! GermanCelt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    941

    Default Re: Fortune?

    of course... he should have been on the pitch from the start. I expected him and Skippy to play. We were successful when both of them started. Why not continue playing with the formation we had success before?

  17. #17
    The '59 Sound Mr Brightside's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    6,533

    Default Re: Fortune?

    I can definetly see him getting off the mark on Saturday
    Quote Originally Posted by Leone Japanmaniac View Post
    Put Barcelona in the SPL-they'd have trouble.
    .
    http://www.justgiving.com/MatthewCarney

  18. #18
    Funny how? Max Raptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    6,724

    Default Re: Fortune?

    I thought he did well against Aberdeen and could prove to be a good asset in the SPL at least.



  19. #19
    nom nom nom Kenshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Shonan
    Posts
    1,901

    Default Re: Fortune?

    I wasn't bothered that he didn't start. No doubt Mowbray had plans to bring him and Skippy on as the game progressed. So far all 3 have played in every game.
    If all I focus on is the pricetag, it is disappointing so far.
    I think he does add something to the team and will be quality in SPL at least. But we still need another goal poacher.
    __________________________________________________

    「Every good Tim has a Tattoo, Fucked a whore, and at least one Infraction」
    ~ Chesty Puller


    http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/4964/hondagoal2.gif

  20. #20
    Banned CE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Glasgow!
    Posts
    4,532

    Default Re: Fortune?

    Your Ad Here
    We paid £3.8million to bring his services to the club. Just because its a big game and price tag doesn't mean he has the right to start, some games don't suit even the best of players.

    Although he is not very good.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74