Thread: Keane or Bellamy?

Originally Posted by Irish_And_Proud

LAWLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wipe yer arse fella,someone's kissin big time!:rofl:


PS.mick yourn a deviant

Originally Posted by MickyBhoy1888

I try not to be

Try harder!!

Originally Posted by Jamesy;237298[B

]Keane is a far better finisher and can work well enough on his own. Bellamy does not and cannot play on his own, which is why he failed so badly at Liverpool. [/B]

Bellamy is quicker, probably has a better overall game than Keane, but he wont score nearly as many goals, Keane is one of the best finishers there are.

Bellamy is also very injury prone, he doesnt play every match because his knees are going, got the pace but the slightest nudge and hes off sometimes.

You not get them mixed up here? Did Keane not fail at Liverpool and Bellamy did because he fell out with everycunt when he went ape shit on Rise?

Originally Posted by cullen93

Keane did well at liverpool... just the manager hated him because the Chief executive signed him

Bellamy 5 in 26
Keane 9 in 21

9 in 21 isn't good, and was it not ages till he finally scored?

Fair enough, I will still always rather have Bellamy, you see how frustrated Keane gets when Samaras plays a pass 40 yards in the opposite direction. Bellamy could score and then run and hit Sammy by himself.

Originally Posted by cullen93

9 in 21 is similar ratio to Drogba, Rooney

he had a 6 week barron spell then a few goals came at once. Can't remember the games too well tbh but my summary was he was there to supply torres/second striker then turned out gerard played really well at second striker so keane got punted for tactical reasons. Honestly wasn't watching much EPL football when bellamy was at liverpool so i'm not sure if he was on the wing or what but the goal game ratio isn't great..

At Liverpool they played Bellamy up on his own, and it was a huge failure. Got himself some goals but no where near what he's capable of. He's not very good with staying on-side either.

I think Bellamy is the better player. He can destroy teams on his own and even if he loses some pace he will still create havoc.
I like Keane's work rate and he has scored more goals that I thought he would as he hasn't ever been prolific at club level although he looks class amongst our strikers.
The only problem you have with Bellamy is that he is a complete w****r. If it isn't going well he seems to lose the plot and moan about everything. This would not be good for the team. He has been outstanding this year though and has been much more settled looking even when moaning about Mancini.
I wouldn't be mad on Hughes coming but if he did then Bellamy may come with him as he seemed to enjoy playing for him.

Bellamy for me but over a longer period Keane would not go in the huff and lose the plot so he could work out better in the long run and would get at least 20 each season.